You are here:

Replace Animal Tests: The EU RAT List

10 animal tests that should be replaced

Despite the acceptance by EU authorities of replacement non-animal methods, these ten animal tests are STILL being carried out in Europe.

We have compiled this updated Replace Animal Tests (RAT) List to highlight animal testing that could stop NOW in the EU.

Ending these ten tests could save the lives of well over three quarters of a million animals every year in Europe alone. 

Over the last 30 years, there have been significant developments in the replacement of tests on animals for regulatory purposes. Non-animal methods have been developed that can now replace, wholly or in part, a number of animal tests across several product sectors. 

However, our experience has been that actually replacing the animal tests takes much longer than it should. This is unacceptable. In recent years, valid non-animal methods assessing skin irritation, skin sensitisation and batch safety have taken years to be completely accepted and, in many cases, the animal tests are still being conducted to meet legal requirements. 

This needs to stop NOW in the interests of animals and better science! 

Not only are non-animal methods often cheaper, faster and more accurate than the animal tests they replace, but EU laws on animal experiments prohibit countries from authorising an animal test if the same result can be obtained using a recognised non-animal approach. In many cases, the problem lies with lack of clarity from and enforcement by the authorities, and the absence of a joined-up approach to acceptance of non-animal tests around the world. 

Skin Irritation with brown rabbit and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Mostly rabbits 
Number of tests in the EU: 3,528 per year 
Product test is used for: Chemicals, medicines, medical devices 
Animal method: A test substance is rubbed on to a 6 cm area of a rabbit’s shaved skin and held in place with a bandage for four hours. The rabbit is then examined for signs of skin damage for 14 days. If there are no signs of irritation, two more rabbits are used in a confirmatory test. Rabbits are singly housed and can suffer from painful skin reactions and rashes. 
Replacement method: Reconstituted human skin models can be used in most cases. They are more predictive than the rabbit test. 

Eye Irritation with White Rabbit and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Rabbits 
Number of tests in the EU: 874 per year 
Product test is used for: Chemicals, pesticides, medicines, medical devices 
Animal method: A test substance is placed in the eyes of live rabbits and left for at least one hour before being washed out. Their eyes are then examined for signs of irritation and damage over three days. If there are no signs of severe irritation in the initial test, two more rabbits are used in a confirmatory test. Rabbits are singly housed and can experience painful damage in their eyes that can lead to blindness. 
Replacement method: Reconstituted human eye models can be used to detect non-irritants. Eyes from hens and cows killed for food can also be used to identify severe irritants and non-irritants. Work is underway to develop a "defined approach” – a combination of chemical-, computer- and cell-based tests – that will enable the non-animal methods to provide additional information about the severity of irritation. 

Skin Sensitisation with brown guinea pig and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Mice, guinea pigs 
Number of tests in the EU: 39,646 per year 
Product test is used for: Chemicals, medicines, medical devices 
Animal method: A test substance is rubbed on to the shaved skin of guinea pigs who are then observed daily for signs of an allergic reaction for almost a month. They may suffer from painful skin reactions and rashes. In the mouse test, a substance is painted on to the ears of mice every day for three days. The mice are then killed three days later, and their ears are dissected. 
Replacement method: Several chemical-, computer- and cell-based tests can be used in combination formalised in a ‘defined approach’ guideline in 2021. These tests include the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), which measures the binding of a substance to proteins, the keratinocyte assay and the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) based on human immune cells. 

Pyrogenicity with whote rabbit and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Rabbits 
Number of tests in the EU: 30,453 per year 
Product test is used for: Medicines (human) 
Animal method: Rabbits are restrained in boxes for up to eight hours per test, with food and water restriction prior to this. They are injected with a test substance into a vein in their ears which often causes damage, and their temperature is monitored through probes inserted deep into their rectums. 
Replacement method: A test that uses human cells – the monocyte activation test (MAT) – was developed in the 2000s. The MAT works by measuring the immune response of human cryo-preserved blood to a test substance. A test using blood from horseshoe crabs (limulus amebocyte lysate; LAL) is another alternative to the live rabbit test, but the crabs are harmed and sometimes killed in the process. The rabbit test is promised to be deleted from EU guidelines by 2026. 

Botulinum toxin test with white rat and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Mice 
Number of tests in the EU: 492,158 per year 
Product test is used for: Medicines (human) 
Animal method: Mice have an injection into their abdomens with the botulinum toxin and, over the following three days, become increasingly paralysed. If left, mice in the higher dose groups will stop being able to breathe and suffocate to death. Approximately 50% of the mice die per test, and survivors are killed at the end of the test. 
Replacement method: The major toxin manufacturers have now developed a cell-based test to replace the batch test for their botox products. 

Antobody production with white sheep and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Various including mice, rabbits, sheep, goats 
Number of tests in the EU: 250,000* per year 
Product test is used for: Medicines (human and vet) 
Animal method: Animals, including mice, rabbits, sheep and goats are used as “factories” to generate large numbers of antibodies. The process involves injecting animals with a substance that stimulates the immune system to produce specific antibodies. The animals often suffer from harmful side effects before their blood is taken to harvest the desired antibodies. Animals are killed when they are no longer useful. 
Replacement method: Phage-display technology – endorsed in 2020 by the EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing – can be used to produce a wide range of antibodies that are of higher quality, more stable, more relevant and more reproducible than the antibodies produced in animals. They are also much faster and cheaper to produce. 

Leptospira vaccine potency test with hamster and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Hamsters 
Number of tests in the EU: 4,286 per year 
Product test is used for: Medicines (vet)  
Animal method: Hamsters are first injected with the vaccine and then, up to 30 days later, Leptospira bacteria are injected into their abdomens. For the batch to pass the test, 80% of the vaccinated animals must survive while 80% of the unvaccinated animals must die or show symptoms of infection, which includes bleeding internally and from the nose. 
Replacement method: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are rapid immunological tests that can be used to detect specific antigens or antibodies. ELISAs have been developed and validated to replace the potency test in hamsters. These tests are more reliable and predictive. 

Veterinary vaccines batch test with beagle puppy and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Can include mice, farmed animals, dogs, cats 
Number of tests in the EU: 5,000* per year 
Product test is used for: Medicines (vet) 
Animal method: In the target and laboratory animal batch safety test animals are injected with two doses of an inactivated vaccine or ten doses of a live vaccine and then observed for at least two weeks.  Animals can suffer painful reactions in the rare occasion the batch is contaminated and as a result of large injection volumes relative to the animals’ size (young animals are often used). 
Replacement method: Improvements in the manufacturing process of vaccines have made animal batch tests redundant. Cell-based tests are also used as part of a “consistency approach” to ensure that each vaccine batch is consistent with previously tested batches.    

Abnormal toxicity with brown and black guinea pig and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Mice, guinea pigs 
Number of tests in the EU: 25,000* per year 
Product test is used for: Medicines (human) 
Animal method: Animals, typically mice and guinea pigs, are injected with a biological product (e.g. vaccines, sera, antibodies) and observed for signs of local and systemic reactions for at least seven days. If one of the animals dies or becomes ill, the test will be repeated a second time.  
Replacement method: Improvements in the manufacturing process of biological products and post-market surveillance have made animal batch tests redundant. Cell-based tests are used as part of a “consistency approach” to ensure that each vaccine batch is consistent with previously tested batches. 

Shellfish toxins with white mouse and hashtag #TheRatList

Species: Mice 
Number of tests in the EU: 37,272 per year 
Product test is used for: Food 
Animal method: Extracts from shellfish are injected into the abdomens of mice and the time until they die is recorded. If two thirds of the mice die within 24 hours, the shellfish is deemed unsafe for human consumption.  
Replacement method: Analytical chemistry methods (high performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods) can be used to check for the presence of paralytic shellfish toxins , amnesic toxins  and lipophilic toxins. 

Notes: Numbers are the number of tests (not animals), taken from the official EU and Norway statistics for the year 2018 unless followed by * which indicates that the calculation is available upon request. Total number of tests = 888,217